![]() On the other hand, if this “ 3rd version” about my dismissal is the “f alse version”, Eni will need to clarify to your Stakeholders the reasons for the company to conduct my case in the way it was stated (and proven) by me in this post. Now, if this “ 3rd version” about my dismissal is the “ true version”, then I was fired for participating in the millionaire scheme just like all the other employees of illicit behavior involved in the frauds and acts of corruption in the Brazilian subsidiary of Eni and, therefore, I am nothing more than an unscrupulous and opportunistic person because, for more than 21 years, I have been supporting an untrue story to take financial advantage of Eni. So, in my understanding, t his context became the most important fact of our history of more than 21 long years, and should be clarified and proven by me and also by Eni's Board. Therefore, when reading this post, Eni's Board would need to be “ fully convinced” about the truth or falsity of this version about my dismissal. So, in my understanding, this context became the most important fact in this Specific Instance, and should be clarified and proven by the Parties. ![]() This was on the grounds that the case too closely resembled a previous submission from the same submitter and no new facts were brought to light since the handling of the previous case.A very important fact that needs to be noted by Eni's Board in relation to the " 3rd version" about my dismissal presented by the company during the Shareholders' Meeting (AGM 2017).Īnd that's because, there are only two possibilities for the content of Eni's presentation regarding the " 3rd version" of my dismissal: either the version is " true” or the version is " false". ![]() On 24 September 2021, the Brazilian NCP adopted an initial assessment deciding not to accept the specific instance. The issues were related to access and disclosure of personal information, similar to a previous case which had already been received by the same submitter. On, Douglas Linares Flinto, an individual, submitted a specific instance to the Brazilian NCP alleging that a Brazilian multinational enterprise, in the Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply sector, had not observed the Concepts and Principles (Chapter I), Disclosure (Chapter III), Human Rights (Chapter IV), and Combating Bribery, Bribe Solicitations and Extortion (Chapter VII) provisions of the Guidelines. View the dedicated page on the Brazilian NCP website. Specific instance alleging a non-observance of the OECD Guidelines.Ĭoncepts and principles, Disclosure, Human rights, Combating bribery, bribe solicitation and extortionĮlectricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply ![]() Douglas Linares Flinto & Brazilian MNE in the Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply sector ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |